Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking Issue for batching #135283

Open
2 of 7 tasks
ZuseZ4 opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 0 comments
Open
2 of 7 tasks

Tracking Issue for batching #135283

ZuseZ4 opened this issue Jan 9, 2025 · 0 comments
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC F-batching `#![feature(batching)]`

Comments

@ZuseZ4
Copy link
Contributor

ZuseZ4 commented Jan 9, 2025

This is a tracking issue for the batching feature of llvm/enzyme.
The feature gate for the issue is #![feature(batching)].

This is the second out of three features that were approved as experiments in a project goal. It allows merging N function calls (e.g. from looping over a call) into a single call, with N being a compile-time constant. This allows better vectorization and other optimizations.

We reuse almost all of the infrastructure from the autodiff macro, with a slightly different syntax both in the user facing macro, as well as the llvm-ir we generate. We intend to later extend the autodiff macro to optionally include the batching feature, however some users might want to use batching without automatic differentiation, which is the motivation for this independent batch macro. It also seems wise to experiment with both independently before trying to merge them.

About tracking issues

Tracking issues are used to record the overall progress of implementation.
They are also used as hubs connecting to other relevant issues, e.g., bugs or open design questions.
A tracking issue is however not meant for large scale discussion, questions, or bug reports about a feature.
Instead, open a dedicated issue for the specific matter and add the relevant feature gate label.
Discussion comments will get marked as off-topic or deleted.
Repeated discussions on the tracking issue may lead to the tracking issue getting locked.

Steps

Unresolved Questions

XXX --- list all the "unresolved questions" found in the RFC to ensure they are
not forgotten

Implementation history

@ZuseZ4 ZuseZ4 added the C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC label Jan 9, 2025
@jieyouxu jieyouxu added the F-batching `#![feature(batching)]` label Jan 9, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
C-tracking-issue Category: An issue tracking the progress of sth. like the implementation of an RFC F-batching `#![feature(batching)]`
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants